Aviation Management Gross National Product

Question: Discuss about theAviation Management forGross National Product. Answer: Introduction Aviation accidents can be measured in terms of anguish, physical pain and gross national product. Aviation accidents have been increasing over time due to increased air traffic. People use air transport more as compared to the twentieth century(Allen Derr, n.d.). Aero plane manufacturers have also increased from all over the world leading to increased competitions of the units to be sold. It has led to increased manufacture of substandard aero plane leading to faulty units. This eventually leads to aviation crashes and therefore there should be disaster management programs in the aviation industry. History and Development of the Accident Caution Model Support providers defined in Annex 19 services - Management of Safety, which are air operators, the air traffic services, schools pilot flight and other activities in the implementation of a program capture safety data during daily and routine operations, as part of its SMS. Such programs are known as LOSA (Line Oriented Safety Audit) for air operators and NOSS (Normal Operations Safety Survey) for providers of air traffic services. This is a model that was developed as a historical and cautionary measure to accidents that were rampant. It is well known the work that CRE has been carrying out for many years in the field of flight to aviation accidents, in an attempt to mitigate as far as possible, its terrible The PRL is based on these ideas: An accident in the air is not an inevitable event, something that inevitably happens by chance or because it had to happen. An accident at work is the demonstration that something has gone wrong in the development of a task that has been a failure. (Glendon Clarke, n.d.). The current legislation is based on the right of aviation workers to work. The course on Managing Threats and Errors provides the knowledge and the necessary content for the air operators and service providers such as air traffic and driving schools can implement in their operations framework of a comprehensive reference of operational safety it is known by its acronym TEM (Threat and Error Management). TEM objectives are:Contribute to the safety and efficiency of air operations through their integration in support of the management systems of safety (SMS - Safety Management Systems). It is an operationally relevant and highly intuitive model, which integrates the management of human performance and operational contexts. Objectives: Develop theoretical knowledge and permit the application of the concepts of TEM in the operations of air operators (including approved maintenance organizations), providers of air traffic services and flight schools. Develop an understanding of international standards (SARPs) concerning TEM within the context of safety management contained in Annexes to the Chicago Convention. Develop the necessary knowledge among participants to enable them to implement the key components of TEM training in their own organizations, in compliance with international standards and national regulations of the country. Pilots, flight instructors, inspectors line directors and managers of flight operations, security officers operations, crew cabin, maintenance personnel, staff of providers of air traffic services and aerodromes, and school staff flight and all those professionals for their daily responsibilities need to know and apply these new concepts in the management of threat and error management sys tems and safety of their organizations. Learn how to prevent incidents and accidents using a structured and documented management of safety in the framework of Air Traffic Management approach. You will be taught to apply the concepts of team resource management (TRM) and specifically the threat error management (TEM). Models of prevention of accidents and incidents in the field of aviation Requirements investigating accidents and incidents, techniques and working practices by the Air traffic controllers, Operational staff and directors of companies that provide services of air traffic management Most government have approved the State Safety Programme (SSP WEIGHT or English) for Civil Aviation, in order to strengthen aviation security through the adoption of a new preventive approach in this area. The establishment of safety objectives State together with the agreement on performance in terms of safety with service providers and aeronautical products complement the current approach of the management of safety based on prescription (ie, in compliance with regulations as administrative controls) with a performance based on safety, beyond mere compliance with the standard (ie, in compliance with regulations and risk controls safety) approach. Strategy: The European Strategic Safety is the set of policies and objectives established by the European Commission. Program: The European program for aviation safety (or -EASP- European Aviation Safety Programme) is the integrated set of regulations and activities aimed at managing safety in Europe within the framework of the Basic Regulation of EASA whole. Plan: The European plan for aviation safety (or Aviation Safety Plan 2014-2017 -EASp-) identifies the critical areas of safety in Europe along with mitigation measures or control measures. This plan has been drawn up by EASA. Although the plan has a range of 4 years, is reviewed annually. The components of the State Safety Program me of the State are: Policy and safety objectives of the state Risk Management State safety. Safety assurance by the State Promotion of safety by the State The buildings today are very complex and require qualified to control, manage, identify and correct problems before they affect operations occupants and operators. But how many companies can really count on a multidisciplinary team to take care of your facilities. Central Remote Operation has a highly qualified team of dedicated professionals who monitor systems 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year, including safety equipment, fire prevention systems air conditioning, civil automation, lighting, and refrigeration, among others in aviation industry. Our experience and expertise ensures the correct prioritization and response to alarming aviation conditions. When an alarm is received, the system automatically assigns the custom actions and quick responses to minimize losses and eliminate risks and threats. In addition, our services meet the legal requirements adopted for fire prevention systems and property insurance companies, and provide accurate record of alarms activities for audit purposes in case of aviation accidents. Monitoring Automation Systems and Air Conditioning Systems Johnson Controls can control all equipment and systems in an installation, to activate alarms and respond to specific protocols. We offer an innovative experience monitoring through remote diagnostics services to identify problems and find solutions quickly and objectively. In addition to monitoring their teams, our operators can take control and operate their systems remotely, minimizing the need to hire local staff and providing the benefits of best practices and operating procedures. Application of Threat and Error Management This model is applicable to aviation companies (People and goods) and companies that have distribution products or services within logistics of the production process. Does not apply to work safety in lifts or machinery especially as backhoes, loaders, bulldozers, feathers, tractors and the like., brings together private ARP. TEM aim is to give an approach to a challenging and dynamic operation in human operation and performance context and therefore influence the complexities which lead to generation of consequences due to safety. The course on Managing Threats and Errors provides the knowledge and the necessary content for the air operators and service providers such as air aviation and driving schools can implement in their operations framework of a comprehensive reference of operational safety it is known by its acronym TEM (Threat and Error Management). TEM objectives are: Contribute to the safety and efficiency of air operations through their integration in support of the management systems of safety (SMS - Safety Management Systems). It is an operationally relevant and highly intuitive model, which integrates the management of aviation performance and contexts. Course Objective: Develop theoretical knowledge and permit the application of the concepts of TEM in the operations of air operators (including approved maintenance organizations), providers of air aviation services and flight schools. Develop an understanding of international standards (SARPs) concerning TEM within the context of safety management contained in Annexes to the Chicago Convention. Develop the necessary knowledge among participants to enable them to implement the key components of TEM training in their own organizations, in compliance with international standards and national regulations of the country(Jorda?o Sousa, 2010). The Applications and Examples in Todays Uses Pilots, flight instructors, inspectors line directors and managers of flight operations, security officers operations, crew cabin, maintenance personnel, staff of providers of air aviation services and aerodromes, and school staff flight and all those professionals for their daily responsibilities need to know and apply these new concepts in the management of threat and error management systems and safety of their organizations.(Wells, 2001). In this way are identified labor process level can be designed risks and occupational risk map to be identified, located occupational hazards and the number of workers exposed, by departments, sections, which is made by the organization.. Occupational hazard identification is a phase contained in the risk management process, this should be done based on the information on the characteristics and complexity of the work in each position. Defining prevention policy Prevention policy includes general intentions, criteria and objectives of the aviation industry and the criteria and principles underlying their actions goals are based. Policy is established taking into account the initial situation, that is, diagnosis developed in the previous stage (Stolzer, Halford, Goglia, 2008). Strengths and Weaknesses of Accident Caution Model Thus, prevention of aviation accidents, accidents that take place in leisure and free time, accidents involving children or accidents that occur at home, are the main areas of action this strategy, which is intended to be "sustainable" over time. We must also mention that if the prevention of accidents is a section to "enhance" the public awareness about the importance of having basic first aid skills that allow us to act once they have occurred, it is not less. Pilots, flight instructors, inspectors line directors and managers of flight operations, security officers operations, crew cabin, maintenance personnel, staff of providers of air aviation services and aerodrome. Performance Criteria: Today different methods for the analysis of convenience and profitability for investments that aim to minimize losses by aviation accident and its economic effect is used, there can be mentioned among these methods the cost - benefit analysis the application of the latter is advantageous: Conclusion According to experts, 30-50% of deaths that occur after a aviation accident occurring in the first 5 minutes after the same, being the two main causes of these deaths, bleeding and breathing problems caused by obstruction of the airway. Management of threats and errors (In English TEM - Threat and Error Management) is a global security concept regarding aviation operations and human performance (Howell Van Hemel, 2007). TEM is not a revolutionary concept, but has gradually evolved as a result of the constant guidance to improve the margins of safety in aviation operations through the practical integration of Human Factors knowledge. References Allen, G. Derr, R. Threat assessment and risk analysis. Ericson, C. (2011). Concise encyclopedia of system safety. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Glendon, A. Clarke, S. Human safety and risk management. Goetsch, D. Occupational safety and health for technologists, engineers, and managers. Green, K. (2002). The aviation industry. Philadelphia: Hanley Belfus. Howell, W. Van Hemel, S. (2007). Staffing standards for aviation safety inspectors.Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Jorda?o, B. Sousa, E. (2010). Risk management. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Kim, H. (2012). Advances in technology and management. Berlin: Springer. Lohia, R. (2013). Aviation industry. New Delhi: Sumit Enterprises. Lumpe, M. (2008). Leadership and organization in the aviation industry. Aldershot, England: Ashgate. Lutz, M. (2011). Aviation safety. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Pierson, K. Pilots in command. Stolzer, A., Halford, C., Goglia, J. (2008). Safety management systems in aviation. Aldershot, Hampshire, England: Ashgate. Threat and error management (TEM) in air traffic control. (2008). Montre?al. Wells, A. (2001). Commercial aviation safety. New York: McGraw-Hill.